Differences
Respond in 1000 words with a scholarly references. Use citations, site your work and add references.
Is there five-factor model too reductionistic ? Provide reasons in your response.
Respond in 1000 words with a scholarly references. Use citations, site your work and add references.
Is there five-factor model too reductionistic ? Provide reasons in your response.
Stratified sampling is a probability sampling method while quota sampling is a non-probability sampling method.
Stratified sampling includes sub-dividing the sample into mutually exclusive and exhaustive groups. A simple random sample is then chosen independently from each group. This way, the probability of each element in a given group being selected is equal. Quota sampling, on the other hand, is a type of judgement sampling. In quota sampling, quotas are set up according to some characteristics. Within a given quota, the interviewer has to interview a certain number of people. The interviewer is free to choose anyone he wants. So personal judgement and bias may come in. However, this is the most common type of non-random sampling.
I neec help with my homework in indstrial orgnaizational psychology. the file in the attchment. All of it multiplr choices and true/flse.
Discuss the Jaffee v. Redmond (1996) case with your classmates. Using the appropriate terminology, examine the background, participants, and historical significance of the case in relation to the standardized substance abuse assessments used in today’s forensic practice. In your discussion, provide the psychometrics of two substance abuse or alcohol-related tools that are preferred in your jail diversion substance abuse program.
http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/jaffee.aspx
PHI-105 Types of Communication Table
In order to write a quality persuasive essay that incorporates critical thinking, you must include a mixture of informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements because to persuade someone you must:
a) Inform them about the topic
b) Explain your argument
c) Persuade your audience to your point of view.
Directions:
1. Use the table below to do the following:
a) Choose a concept and write an informative statement, an explanatory statement, and a persuasive statement for the concept in the appropriate boxes. An example has been completed for you in red.
b) In part b of the table, select a concept from the draft of your persuasive essay and provide an example of one informative statement, one explanatory statement, and one persuasive statement based on the concept you chose.
c) As discussed in the module lecture, language is intertwined with critical thinking. In part c of the table, in 200-250 words explain the relationship between informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements and critical thinking.
Utilizing the Checklist for Critiquing a Research Report in our textbook, critique an article selected from the APUS Online Library. Be specific with your explanations and write at least 2-3 sentences for each.Your initial post should be minimum of 400 words and your two required replies to your classmates’ initial posts should be minimum of 250 words.Step 1 Completion ExampleStep 1: The Problema. Is the problem clearly and concisely stated? (yes or no followed by explanation)b. Is the problem adequately narrowed down into a researchable problem? (yes or no followed by explanation)c. Is the problem significant enough to warrant a formal research effort? (yes or no followed by explanation)d. Is the relationship between the identified problem and previous research clearly described? (yes or no followed by explanation)
Simple Question:
Should we use “professional jurors” instead of ordinary U.S. citizens? Why or why not?
200-400 words IF possible. Not really a right or wrong answer, I just don’t feel like doing it.
Please be detailed and make sense.
THIS ASSIGNBMENT MUST BE DONE WITHIN 2 HOURS, OR I HAVE NO USE FOR THE COMPLETTION OF YOUR WORK. ANSWER MUST BE CORRECT AND ALL WRITTEN QUESTIONS NEED TO BE WRITTEN CLEARLY SO I CAN UNDERSTAND.
IT”S DUE IN A FEW HOURS
SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Please provide an annotation for the two articles attached AND identify three common themes in both articles.
Note the purpose of the article, the participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions? Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
Due tomorrow, 02/07/2017 at noon.
Note the purpose of the article, the participants/subject of the study, the conclusions drawn by the author(s), and the validity of the conclusions. Evaluate the article: is it a credible source? Describe the credibility of the author – are there any biases? How well did the author support his or her assertions? Did they provide an adequate literature review? Were there any limitations?
– Must be origional work
Imagine that you have been asked to write a research-based blog post for a human resource management website.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word blog that includes the following:
Include at least three peer-reviewed sources in the blog post.
Format the citations in your blog post consistent with APA guidelines.
Street, 11000 Helsinki, Finland
+1 (231) 242-8514
support@nursingschoolessays.com